site stats

Grava v. ins 205 f.3d 1177 9th cir. 2000

WebFeb 13, 2002 · INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2000) (“[M]ilitary officials cannot claim political persecution arising solely from the performance of their duties.”). Without any … WebINS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2000). The “salient question” is whether the petitioner's opposition to corruption was “directed toward a governing institution, or only against individuals whose corruption was aberrational.” Grava, 205 F.3d at 1181.

PEDRO ABARCA V. MERRICK GARLAND, No. 18-72458 (9th Cir.

WebFeb 11, 2000 · 205 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2000) DIONESIO CALUNSAG GRAVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATIONAND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 98-70981 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted February 11, 2000 Filed March 7, 2000 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] WebFeb 11, 2000 · Based on his political beliefs and activities as a policeman and customs officer, Grava claims to have suffered and fears persecution from all sides: Marcos … raymond pitcairn https://thetoonz.net

Matter of F-P-R-, Respondent - United States Department of …

WebFeb 27, 2015 · KHUDAVERDYAN V. HOLDER 9 determinations. Id. We will remand if the BIA rested its conclusion on “erroneous legal premises.” Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). We also will remand if the BIA did not reach an essential issue. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. at 17–18. DISCUSSION To establish eligibility for asylum, a petitioner ... WebJan 7, 2008 · INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2000), the BIA erred in concluding that Fedunyak's... Grava , 205 F.3d at 1181) (holding that petitioner was eligible for asylum where he acted against corruption by rescuing two … WebAug 27, 2024 · Grava , 205 F.3d at 1181. " [T]he salient question," we have reasoned, is whether the alien's "actions were directed toward a governing institution" or "against individuals whose corruption was aberrational." Id. ; see also Khudaverdyan , 778 F.3d at 1106 (similar); Fedunyak v. Gonzales , 477 F.3d 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2007) (similar). raymond pirtle nashville tn

GRAVA v. I.N.S 205 F.3d 1177 9th Cir. - Casemine

Category:Matter of F-P-R-, Respondent

Tags:Grava v. ins 205 f.3d 1177 9th cir. 2000

Grava v. ins 205 f.3d 1177 9th cir. 2000

MAMOUZIAN v. ASHCROFT (2004) FindLaw

WebMar 7, 2000 · Grava fears that Toledo, who retained his position following the investigation, will kill him just as Toledo allegedly killed one of Grava's fellow customs officers. He argues that the Philippines remains corrupt, subject to martial law, and … WebFeb 26, 2015 · Hayrapetyan v. Mukasey , 534 F.3d 1330, 1337 (10th Cir. 2008); Grava v. INS , 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000). Additionally, while there is no categorical distinction between opposition to ... (citing INS v.Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (holding that the applicant did not demonstrate ...

Grava v. ins 205 f.3d 1177 9th cir. 2000

Did you know?

WebFeb 27, 2015 · Grava, 205 F.3d at 1181. In Singh v. Holder, 764 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2014), we addressed what type of evidence can demonstrate that a persecutor imputed a political opinion to an applicant. Testimony regarding a persecutor's statements about motive is direct evidence that the applicant's political opinion motivated the persecution. Id. at 1159. WebDIONESIO CALUNSAG GRAVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 98-70981 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR …

WebGrava v. INS - 205 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2000) Rule: Purely personal retribution is, of course, not persecution on account of political opinion. Thus, retaliation completely untethered … WebGrava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000). We agree that, in some circumstances, opposition to state corruption may provide evidence of an alien’s political opinion or give …

WebJul 25, 2014 · July 25, 2006, in accordance with Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2000). After giving the parties a final opportunity to submit briefs on the issues of the respondent’s eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal, the Immigration Judge issued an oral decision granting the respondent’s In Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2000), we addressed the question of whether retaliation for the act of publicizing corruption amounts to persecution on account of a political opinion. Summary of this case from Hasan v. Ashcroft See more The Board had no basis in regulations or its own precedent to disregard Grava's written application as sworn to at the deportation hearing, … See more Grava also argues that he was denied his Fifth Amendment due process right to effective assistance of counsel in his deportation hearing because his lawyer in that proceeding … See more A remand is warranted only if Grava were prejudiced by the Board's departure from its own regulations and precedent. See United States v. Cerda-Pena, 799 F.2d 1374, 1377(9th Cir. … See more

WebGet Grava v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 205 F.3d 1177 (2000), United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and …

WebMar 7, 2000 · 205 F.3d 1177 DIONESIO CALUNSAG GRAVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATIONAND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 98-70981 UNITED … raymond pitt doddingtonWebAug 27, 2024 · Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Khudaverdyan v. Holder, 778 F.3d 1101, 1106 (9th Cir. 2015). If “alleged corruption is inextricably … raymond pittman obituaryWebJul 25, 2014 · July 25, 2006, in accordance with Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2000). After giving the parties a final opportunity to submit briefs on the issues of the … raymond pit trainingWebApr 17, 2001 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: June 26th, 2001 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 254 F.3d 859 Docket Number: 99-70739 254 F.3d 859 (9th Cir. 2001) QUIRINO CANEDO OCHAVE AND FELICITAS PAGADOR OCHAVE, PETITIONERS, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT. … raymond pineda npiWebJun 17, 2024 · Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 n.3 (9th Cir. 2000). Therefore, Bucio-Abarca’s proposed groups are not cognizable for purposes of withholding of removal. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (concluding that general opposition to gang activity is not a 3 political opinion), abrogated on other grounds by … raymond pitcairn wikipediaWebMar 23, 2024 · Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Ninth Circuit › 2024 › BEHNOOSH ASHTARI V. MERRICK GARLAND BEHNOOSH ASHTARI V. MERRICK GARLAND, No. 18-72355 (9th Cir. 2024) Annotate this Case Download PDF of 0 An error occurred while loading the PDF. More Information raymond pisch andover ctWebsee also Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 n.3 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Purely personal retribution is, of course, not persecution on account of political opinion.”). The evidence also does not compel the conclusion that Sanjaa was attacked on account of any whistleblowing activity. Whistleblowing and opposition to government raymond pitt manchester